'You shall not defile your daughter by making her a harlot, lest the Land fall into harlotry, and the land be filled with immorality.' (19, 29)
You may like it or not, but prostitution, even though seen as the oldest profession in the world, doesn't belong to the Jewish system of values. Certainly, if a girl is still under the auspice of the parents, she is not to be submitted to a man for his pleasure. We can ask, what happens with the society, where young women live for a long period before they get married out of the parental house and can independently choose what to do. It seems to me that the story goes as with other aspects of morality - since the world today is more open and people are less bound by structures, they are at the same time challenged more in the field of morality. Their right choice has higher value, because it is technically so easy, the world does not condemn that, there is almost no stigma. Therefore, I think nowadays a single girl simply should behave to herself as if she was her own father (however ridiculous it sounds). The message is still clear - harlotry is something that should not happen in Eretz Yisrael.
(And a question remains: Is harlotry halachically to be understood in the wide terms of Rashi?)
'A male who lies with a male as one would with a woman, both of them have commited an abomination...' (20, 13)
Although a sensitive subject, especially in religious society, it must be talked in proportions. Here, I understand, with the help of Rashi, that the forbidden male-male relations are those, that emulate the male-female sexual relations (see Rashi there). Any other intimate relationship between two men can be viewed as strange, not ideal or whatever, if we want to criticise, but not as immoral from the point of view of the Torah.
This does not help so much those who would like to see one-sex marriages (if so, we should probably re-define the institution of marriage), but it definitively can help those who struggle with their own homosexuality - not because they would feel themselves problematic, but maybe only because of the negative reaction to condemnation by people around.
And a bit of life experience - not related to this Parasha, but to my recent Shabbat guests. There first or second visit in Israel. They looked around. They saw rosemary plants, birds, ficuses, everything in much bigger version than to be found abroad. Suddenly, everything seemed to them so huge. And I could not help not thinking of the first visitors to Eretz Yisrael after Exodus - the spies. What was their impression? What did they bring backto show the soon-to-be olim chadashim?
And a bit of life experience - not related to this Parasha, but to my recent Shabbat guests. There first or second visit in Israel. They looked around. They saw rosemary plants, birds, ficuses, everything in much bigger version than to be found abroad. Suddenly, everything seemed to them so huge. And I could not help not thinking of the first visitors to Eretz Yisrael after Exodus - the spies. What was their impression? What did they bring backto show the soon-to-be olim chadashim?



